No doubt,
our General Secretary has repeatedly requested our Directorate to withdraw
the exam notification in view of various disparities pointed out in the different
communications to Directorate but to no result. Our GS was right while
raising our concern with Directorate not to adopt two parameters by allowing some
similar placed candidates to appear in PS Group “B” and no to others. Results
being the aggrieved are approaching the Hon’ble CAT for relief. Hon’ble CAT
Lucknow bench giving relief to the applicant has stayed the final result of
PS Group “B” examination that will be subject to the final orders of the Tribunal.
Such circumstances and adamant attitude of the administration is not only going
to be the root cause of frustration amongst the IP
cadre but these can also be an impediment in effective execution of
administrative policies and plan. This is bound to have an adverse impact on
the efficiency of the department. No organization can last long with the
service of its frustrated employees. It is therefore necessary to strengthen
the backbone of the department with a fair deal. Still the department should think of the step motherly treatment to the cause of IP/ASP. GS has rightly said that it
is not understood why department is going against the rules to promote
officials without any health competition. Now in such circumstances out of
the strength of around 4000, IP/ASPs only 1000-1500 may be eligible and around
100 will be serious. Can we say will it be a health competition? Any way exam
will be held and our best wishes are for those who are appearing in the exam against
all odds.
Sr. Postmaster CAT case filed in Chandigarh bench come up for hearing before Hon’ble CAT (Single bench) on 30-5-2012. As Govt. standing counsel was
not present in the court so no hearing took place. Next date of hearing in
the case has been fixed for 2-7-2012
|
All INDIA ASSOCIATION OF INSPECTOR AND ASSTT SUPDT POST PUNJAB CIRCLE, CHANDIGARH.
Saturday, June 2, 2012
CAT CASE ONE AFTER ANOTHER
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Sir,
IP 2004 batch were not allowed for Gr B Exam 2012 despite series of representations pouring in the Directorate. What to say about a healthy competition. In the exam there is no new competitors. All the eligible candidates of Gr B Exam 2011 are the only eligible candidates for Gr B Exam 2012 and even amongst them, a few are having nil penalty, reprimand for the last consecutive five years of ACR/service at their credit. Time is testing again and again.
Nevertheless Best of luck to all aspirants.
IP-2004 Exam was postponed thrice hence its successful candidates have been forced to join their regular duties on 16.01.2006 with which they have not been treated as eligible technically for this PS Gr. B exam because of completion of 5 years regular service as on 01.01.2011. I have tried to convince the D.G Posts by the way of representations to allow such candidates for the sake of healthy competition as no fresh batch of IPs is going to appear in said examination. But department’s stand was still adamant and PS Group B exam 2012 on 03.06.2012 has been conducted with repeated IP/ASP candidates which were also appeared in PS Gr. B exam 2011. I give my best wishes to my all IP/ASP friends who have appeared in this exam on 03.06.2012 for their great success in this exam.
Dear Sir,
The notification issued on 10.04.2012 was for PS Group B 2012 and the Vacancy was also calculated for the year 2012, then how the date 01.01.2011 is fixed for calculating the qualifying Service. It should have been 01.01.2012, in place of 01.01.2011. As the Department was doing the same mistake earlier, they want to continue this time also without any justification. This point may also be highlighted before the Tribunal.
dear sir,
the directorate has issued an administrative instruction on 16.5.2012 to admit seniors if any of the juniors have been admitted. admistrative instructions cannot be issued without ammemdment of rectt rules. and without publishing the IP gradation list, how is it possible to know who is junior and who is senior. such vague instructions can't withstand.
Post a Comment